Malviya, Gaurav and Lannagan, Tamsin R.M. and Johnson, Emma and Mackintosh, Agata and Bielik, Robert and Peters, Adam and Soloviev, Dmitry and Brown, Gavin and Jackstadt, Rene and Nixon, Colin and Gilroy, Kathryn and Campbell, Andrew and Sansom, Owen J. and Lewis, David Y. (2024) Noninvasive stratification of colon cancer by multiplex PET imaging. Clinical Cancer Research, 30 (8). pp. 1518-1529. ISSN 1078-0432

<img xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="https://pub.demo35.eprints-hosting.org/293/1.haslightboxThumbnailVersion/324936.pdf" class="document_preview_tile_thumbnail"/> <span xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" title="324936.pdf">324936.pdf</span>
324936.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (19MB)
Abstract

Purpose:
The current approach for molecular subtyping of colon cancer relies on gene expression profiling, which is invasive and has limited ability to reveal dynamics and spatial heterogeneity. Molecular imaging techniques, such as PET, present a noninvasive alternative for visualizing biological information from tumors. However, the factors influencing PET imaging phenotype, the suitable PET radiotracers for differentiating tumor subtypes, and the relationship between PET phenotypes and tumor genotype or gene expression–based subtyping remain unknown.

Experimental Design:
In this study, we conducted 126 PET scans using four different metabolic PET tracers, [18F]fluorodeoxy-D-glucose ([18F]FDG), O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine ([18F]FET), 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]fluorothymidine ([18F]FLT), and [11C]acetate ([11C]ACE), using a spectrum of five preclinical colon cancer models with varying genetics (BMT, AKPN, AK, AKPT, KPN), at three sites (subcutaneous, orthograft, autochthonous) and at two tumor stages (primary vs. metastatic).

Results:
The results demonstrate that imaging signatures are influenced by genotype, tumor environment, and stage. PET imaging signatures exhibited significant heterogeneity, with each cancer model displaying distinct radiotracer profiles. Oncogenic Kras and Apc loss showed the most distinctive imaging features, with [18F]FLT and [18F]FET being particularly effective, respectively. The tissue environment notably impacted [18F]FDG uptake, and in a metastatic model, [18F]FET demonstrated higher uptake.

Conclusions:
By examining factors contributing to PET-imaging phenotype, this study establishes the feasibility of noninvasive molecular stratification using multiplex radiotracer PET. It lays the foundation for further exploration of PET-based subtyping in human cancer, thereby facilitating noninvasive molecular diagnosis.

Information
Library
URI https://pub.demo35.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/293
View Item