Colburn, Ben (2025) Palliative care-based arguments against assisted dying. Bioethics, 39 (2). pp. 187-194. ISSN 0269-9702

<img xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="https://pub.demo35.eprints-hosting.org/56/1.haslightboxThumbnailVersion/334566.pdf" class="document_preview_tile_thumbnail"/> <span xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" title="334566.pdf">334566.pdf</span>
334566.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (722kB)
Abstract

Opponents of legalised assisted dying often assert that palliative care is worse in countries where assisted dying has been legalised, and imply that legalised assisted dying makes palliative care worse. This study considers five versions of this claim: that it is difficulty to access expert palliative care in countries where assisted dying has been legalised, that those countries rank low in their quality of end-of-life care; that legalising assisted dying doesn't expand patient choice in respect of palliative care; that growth in palliative care services has stalled in countries where assisted dying has been legalised; and that legalised assisted dying impedes the growth of palliative care or causes it to decline. In each case, it concludes that neither argumentation nor evidence supports these claims.

Information
Library
URI https://pub.demo35.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/56
View Item