Colburn, Ben (2025) Palliative care-based arguments against assisted dying. Bioethics, 39 (2). pp. 187-194. ISSN 0269-9702
AI Summary:
This study examines five claims that legalised assisted dying makes palliative care worse. The study concludes that neither argumentation nor evidence supports these claims.AI Topics:
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (722kB)
Opponents of legalised assisted dying often assert that palliative care is worse in countries where assisted dying has been legalised, and imply that legalised assisted dying makes palliative care worse. This study considers five versions of this claim: that it is difficulty to access expert palliative care in countries where assisted dying has been legalised, that those countries rank low in their quality of end-of-life care; that legalising assisted dying doesn't expand patient choice in respect of palliative care; that growth in palliative care services has stalled in countries where assisted dying has been legalised; and that legalised assisted dying impedes the growth of palliative care or causes it to decline. In each case, it concludes that neither argumentation nor evidence supports these claims.
Title | Palliative care-based arguments against assisted dying |
---|---|
Creators | Colburn, Ben |
Identification Number | 10.1111/bioe.13352 |
Date | February 2025 |
Divisions | College of Arts & Humanities > School of Humanities > Philosophy |
Publisher | Wiley |
URI | https://pub.demo35.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/56 |
---|
Item Type | Article |
---|---|
Depositing User | Unnamed user with email ejo1f20@soton.ac.uk |
Date Deposited | 11 Jun 2025 16:34 |
Revision | 20 |
Last Modified | 12 Jun 2025 13:07 |
![]() |