Fizazi, Karim and Azad, Arun A. and Matsubara, Nobuaki and Carles, Joan and Fay, Andre P. and De Giorgi, Ugo and Joung, Jae Young and Fong, Peter C. C. and Voog, Eric and Jones, Robert J. and Shore, Neal D. and Dunshee, Curtis and Zschäbitz, Stefanie and Oldenburg, Jan and Ye, Dingwei and Lin, Xun and Healy, Cynthia G. and Di Santo, Nicola and Laird, A. Douglas and Zohren, Fabian and Agarwal, Neeraj (2023) First-line talazoparib with enzalutamide in HRR-deficient metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: The phase 3 TALAPRO-2 trial. Nature Medicine, 30. pp. 257-264. ISSN 1078-8956

<img xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="https://pub.demo35.eprints-hosting.org/430/1.haslightboxThumbnailVersion/317847.pdf" class="document_preview_tile_thumbnail"/> <span xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" title="317847.pdf">317847.pdf</span>
317847.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (6MB)
Abstract

Preclinical evidence has suggested an interplay between the androgen receptor, which largely drives the growth of prostate cancer cells, and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. This association provides a rationale for their co-inhibition for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), an area of unmet medical need. The phase 3 TALAPRO-2 study investigated combining the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor talazoparib with enzalutamide versus enzalutamide alone as first-line treatment of mCRPC. Patients were prospectively assessed for tumor alterations in DNA damage response genes involved in homologous recombination repair (HRR). Two cohorts were enrolled sequentially: an all-comers cohort that was enrolled first (cohort 1; N = 805 (169 were HRR-deficient)), followed by an HRR-deficient-only cohort (cohort 2; N = 230). We present results from the alpha-controlled primary analysis for the combined HRR-deficient population (N = 399). Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to talazoparib or placebo, plus enzalutamide. The primary endpoint, radiographic progression-free survival, was met (median not reached at the time of the analysis for the talazoparib group versus 13.8 months for the placebo group; hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.33 to 0.61; P &lt; 0.0001). Data for overall survival, a key secondary endpoint, are immature but favor talazoparib (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.46 to 1.03; P = 0.07). Common adverse events in the talazoparib group were anemia, fatigue and neutropenia. Combining talazoparib with enzalutamide significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival in patients with mCRPC harboring HRR gene alterations, supporting talazoparib plus enzalutamide as a potential first-line treatment for these patients.

Information
Library
URI https://pub.demo35.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/430
View Item