Critchlow, Simone and Bullement, Ash and Crabb, Simon and Jones, Robert and Christoforou, Katerina and Amin, Amerah and Xiao, Ying and Kapetanakis, Venediktos and Benedict, Ágnes and Chang, Jane and Kearney, Mairead and Eccleston, Anthony (2024) Cost–effectiveness analysis for avelumab first-line maintenance treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma in Scotland. Future Oncology, 20 (8). pp. 459-470. ISSN 1479-6694

<img xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="https://pub.demo35.eprints-hosting.org/349/3.haslightboxThumbnailVersion/305260.pdf" class="document_preview_tile_thumbnail"/> <span xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" title="305260.pdf">305260.pdf</span>
305260.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (3MB)
Abstract

Aim: The cost–effectiveness of avelumab first-line maintenance treatment for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in Scotland was assessed.

Materials and methods: A partitioned survival model was developed comparing avelumab plus best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone, incorporating JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial data, costs from national databases and published literature and clinical expert validation of assumptions. Incremental cost–effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated using lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY).

Results: Avelumab plus BSC had incremental costs of £9446 and a QALY gain of 0.63, leading to a base-case (deterministic) ICER of £15,046 per QALY gained, supported by robust sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion: Avelumab first-line maintenance is likely to be a cost-effective treatment for locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in Scotland.

Information
Library
URI https://pub.demo35.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/349
View Item