Kearl, Timothy and Wallace, Robert H. (2024) Agentive modals and agentive modality. American Philosophical Quarterly, 61 (2). pp. 139-155. ISSN 0003-0481
AI Summary:
The paper discusses recent attempts to metaphysically explain agentive modality using conditionals. The authors argue that these approaches face counterexamples and take some agentive modality for granted.AI Topics:
In this paper, we consider recent attempts to metaphysically explain agentive modality in terms of conditionals. We suggest that the best recent accounts face counterexamples, and more worryingly, they take some agentive modality for granted. In particular, the ability to perform basic actions features as a primitive in these theories. While it is perfectly acceptable for a semantics of agentive modal claims to take some modality for granted in getting the extension of action claims correct, a metaphysical explanation of agentive modality cannot, at least not in the way that conditional approaches to agentive modality do. We argue that this problem was present even in the classical conditional analysis. By a pessimistic induction, we suggest that, probably, no conditional approach to agentive modality will succeed.
Kearl, Timothy R.
Author
Kearl, Timothy and Wallace, Robert H. (2024) Agentive modals and agentive modality. American Philosophical Quarterly, 61 (2). pp. 139-155. ISSN 0003-0481
Kearl, Timothy R. (2023) Epistemic control without voluntarism. Philosophical Issues, 33 (1). pp. 95-109. ISSN 1533-6077
See full publications listWallace, Robert H.
Author
Kearl, Timothy and Wallace, Robert H. (2024) Agentive modals and agentive modality. American Philosophical Quarterly, 61 (2). pp. 139-155. ISSN 0003-0481
See full publications list