Rescigno, Pasquale and Porta, Nuria and Finneran, Laura and Riisnaes, Ruth and Figueiredo, Ines and Carreira, Suzanne and Flohr, Penny and Miranda, Susana and Bertan, Claudia and Ferreira, Ana and Crespo, Mateus and Rodrigues, Daniel Nava and Gurel, Bora and Nobes, Jenny and Crabb, Simon and Malik, Zafar and Ralph, Christy and McGovern, Ursula and Hoskin, Peter and Jones, Robert J. and Birtle, Alison and Gale, Joanna and Sankey, Peter and Jain, Suneil and McLaren, Duncan and Chadwick, Eliot and Espinasse, Aude and Hall, Emma and de Bono, Johann (2024) Capivasertib in combination with enzalutamide for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer after docetaxel and abiraterone: Results from the randomized phase II RE-AKT trial. European Journal of Cancer, 205: 114103. ISSN 0959-8049

<img xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="https://pub.demo35.eprints-hosting.org/268/1.haslightboxThumbnailVersion/326768.pdf" class="document_preview_tile_thumbnail"/> <span xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" title="326768.pdf">326768.pdf</span>
326768.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (2MB)
Abstract

Background
PTEN loss and aberrations in PI3K/AKT signaling kinases associate with poorer response to abiraterone acetate (AA) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). In this study, we assessed antitumor activity of the AKT inhibitor capivasertib combined with enzalutamide in mCRPC with prior progression on AA and docetaxel.

Methods
This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase 2 trial, recruited men ≥ 18 years with progressing mCRPC and performance status 0–2 from 15 UK centers. Randomized participants (1:1) received enzalutamide (160 mg orally, once daily) with capivasertib (400 mg)/ placebo orally, twice daily on an intermittent (4 days on, 3 days off) schedule. Primary endpoint was composite response rate (RR): RECIST 1.1 objective response, ≥ 50 % PSA decrease from baseline, or circulating tumor cell count conversion (from ≥ 5 at baseline to &lt; 5 cells/7.5 mL). Subgroup analyses by PTENIHC status were pre-planned.

Results
Overall, 100 participants were randomized (50:50); 95 were evaluable for primary endpoint (47:48); median follow-up was 43 months. RR were 9/47 (19.1 %) enzalutamide/capivasertib and 9/48 (18.8 %) enzalutamide/placebo (absolute difference 0.4 % 90 %CI −12.8 to 13.6, p = 0.58), with similar results in the PTENIHC loss subgroup. Irrespective of treatment, OS was significantly worse for PTENIHC loss (10.1 months [95 %CI: 4.6–13.9] vs 14.8 months [95 %CI: 10.8–18]; p = 0.02). Most common treatment-emergent grade ≥ 3 adverse events for the combination were diarrhea (13 % vs 2 %) and fatigue (10 % vs 6 %).

Conclusions
Combined capivasertib/enzalutamide was well tolerated but didn’t significantly improve outcomes from abiraterone pre-treated mCRPC.

Information
Library
URI https://pub.demo35.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/268
View Item