Pouwels, Koen B. and Eyre, David W. and House, Thomas and Aspey, Ben and Matthews, Philippa C. and Stoesser, Nicole and Newton, John N. and Diamond, Ian and Studley, Ruth and Taylor, Nick G. H. and Bell, John I. and Farrar, Jeremy and Kolenchery, Jaison and Marsden, Brian D. and Hoosdally, Sarah and Jones, E. Yvonne and Stuart, David I. and Crook, Derrick W. and Peto, Tim E. A. and Walker, A. Sarah and Wei, Jia and Pritchard, Emma and Vihta, Karina-Doris and Doherty, George and Kavanagh, James and Chau, Kevin K. and Hatch, Stephanie B. and Ebner, Daniel and Ferreira, Lucas Martins and Christott, Thomas and Dejnirattisai, Wanwisa and Mongkolsapaya, Juthathip and Cameron, Sarah and Tamblin-Hopper, Phoebe and Wolna, Magda and Brown, Rachael and Cornall, Richard and Screaton, Gavin and Lythgoe, Katrina and Bonsall, David and Golubchik, Tanya and Fryer, Helen and Thomas, Tina and Ayoubkhani, Daniel and Black, Russell and Felton, Antonio and Crees, Megan and Jones, Joel and Lloyd, Lina and Sutherland, Esther and Cox, Stuart and Paddon, Kevin and James, Tim and Robotham, Julie V. and Birrell, Paul and Jordan, Helena and Sheppard, Tim and Athey, Graham and Moody, Dan and Curry, Leigh and Brereton, Pamela and Jarvis, Ian and Godsmark, Anna and Morris, George and Mallick, Bobby and Eeles, Phil and Hay, Jodie and VanSteenhouse, Harper and Lee, Jessica and White, Sean and Evans, Tim and Bloemberg, Lisa and Allison, Katie and Pandya, Anouska and Davis, Sophie and Conway, David I. and MacLeod, Margaret and Cunningham, Chris (2024) Improving the representativeness of UK’s national COVID-19 Infection Survey through spatio-temporal regression and post-stratification. Nature Communications, 15: 5340. ISSN 2041-1723

<img xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="https://pub.demo35.eprints-hosting.org/225/1.haslightboxThumbnailVersion/336265.pdf" class="document_preview_tile_thumbnail"/> <span xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" title="336265.pdf">336265.pdf</span>
336265.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB)
Abstract

Population-representative estimates of SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence and antibody levels in specific geographic areas at different time points are needed to optimise policy responses. However, even population-wide surveys are potentially impacted by biases arising from differences in participation rates across key groups. Here, we used spatio-temporal regression and post-stratification models to UK’s national COVID-19 Infection Survey (CIS) to obtain representative estimates of PCR positivity (6,496,052 tests) and antibody prevalence (1,941,333 tests) for different regions, ages and ethnicities (7-December-2020 to 4-May-2022). Not accounting for vaccination status through post-stratification led to small underestimation of PCR positivity, but more substantial overestimations of antibody levels in the population (up to 21 percentage points), particularly in groups with low vaccine uptake in the general population. There was marked variation in the relative contribution of different areas and age-groups to each wave. Future analyses of infectious disease surveys should take into account major drivers of outcomes of interest that may also influence participation, with vaccination being an important factor to consider.

Information
Library
URI https://pub.demo35.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/225
View Item