Williamson, Aoife and Houston, Peter and Paterson, Jennifer and Chalmers, Anthony J. and McLoone, Philip and Fullerton, Natasha and Foo, Sin Yee and James, Allan and Nowicki, Stefan (2024) Dosimetric comparison of hippocampal sparing technologies in patients with low grade glioma. Neuro-Oncology Advances, 6 (1): vdae131. ISSN 2632-2498

<img xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" src="https://pub.demo35.eprints-hosting.org/101/2.haslightboxThumbnailVersion/332203.pdf" class="document_preview_tile_thumbnail"/> <span xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" title="332203.pdf">332203.pdf</span>
332203.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (775kB)
Abstract

Background:
Radiotherapy (RT) plays an integral role in the management of low-grade gliomas (LGG). Late toxicity from RT can cause progressive neurocognitive dysfunction. Radiation-induced damage to the hippocampus (HCP) plays a considerable role in memory decline. Advancements in photon planning software have resulted in the development of multi-criteria optimization (MCO) and HyperArc technologies which may improve HCP sparing while maintaining PTV target coverage.

Methods:
Three planning methods for hippocampal sparing (HS) were compared, VMAT without HS (VMAT_noHS), VMAT with HS (VMAT_HS), MCO with HS (VMAT_MCO), and HyperArc with HS (HyperArc_HS).

Results:
25 patients were identified. The contralateral HCP was spared in 16 patients and bilateral HCP in 9 patients with superiorly located tumours. All three HS planning techniques showed significant reductions in dose to the spared HCP in contralateral cases but only VMAT_HS and HyperArc_HS achieved this in bilateral cases (p &lt; 0.008). Only VMAT_MCO was superior to VMAT_HS in lowering the dose to both contralateral HCP and bilateral HCP in all measured metrics (p&lt;0.008). PTV and OAR (organ at risk) dose constraints were achieved for all plans.

Conclusion:
This retrospective dosimetric study demonstrated the feasibility of hippocampal sparing for low-grade glioma. All three HS planning techniques achieved significant dose reductions to the spared contralateral hippocampus, but only MCO_HS and VMAT_HS achieved this in bilateral cases. MCO was superior to other planning techniques for sparing of both bilateral and contralateral hippocampi.

Information
Library
URI https://pub.demo35.eprints-hosting.org/id/eprint/101
View Item